US Army Warned of Airborne Ebola While Ape President and Rat CDC Chief Claimed It was Impossible

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 17, 2014

Yeah... we're doomed.

Yeah… we’re doomed.

The evil Black President and the sickening Jew CDC Chief continue to tell us that Ebola cannot go airborne.  However, a handbook published by the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, entitled “USAMRID’s Medical Management of Biological Casualties Handbook,” claims otherwise.

The document contains a chapter discussing “Viral Hemorrhagic Fever” (VHF), a category of viruses that includes Ebola, which states:

In several instances, secondary infections among contacts and medical personnel without direct body fluid exposure have been documented. These instances have propped concern of a rare phenomenon of aerosol transmission of Ebola.

Many are questioning whether the lying Jew running the CDC is lying to the people about the nature of this deadly virus he and his monkey friend have purposefully brought into the United States, and this document appears to confirm that blatantly obvious fact.

The handbook describes specific procedures for caring for a person suspected to be infected with VHF, which involve futuristic bio-containment equipment.  This equipment is not possessed by the majority of US hospitals, let alone by the passengers of commercial jetliners whom Obama and his Jew CDC comrade Frieden are forcing to ride with infected persons.

The World Health Organization has itself admitted that the current strain of Ebola infecting the entire world due to a refusal to contain Africa is known to have been transmitted through coughing and sneezing, which technically means it is already airborne, just not transmitted through respiration.

Theoretically, wet and bigger droplets from a heavily infected individual, who has respiratory symptoms caused by other conditions or who vomits violently, could transmit the virus over a short distance to a nearby person,” the e-mail stated.

This could happen when virus-laden droplets are directly propelled, by coughing or sneezing…

So basically, most of us are probably going to die.

But hey, at least we won’t die evil racists who wanted to stop flights from Africa merely so that we could keep from dying from a deadly virus. And that really is what’s most important in the world: not ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever hurting the feelings of Black people.  After all, two hundred years ago, some of their ancestors were slaves, so all of their problems are our fault, and we must deal with them – even if it means we all die.

1 note

New York Times Income Research Crushes “White Privilege” Gibberish

CofCC
October 19, 2014

Myth busted.

Myth busted.

We originally reported this in 2012. However, it is important to bring it back up as the media is now pushing “white privilege” conspiracy theories on a national level.

According to the New York Times, the income gap between Reform Jews and Hindus vs. the rest of America is greater than the income gap between blacks and whites. According the radical leftists like Tim Wise, himself an extremely wealthy Reform Jew, “privileged” population groups should relinquish their wealth. Tim Wise continues to make more money by advocating his extreme race-based Marxism, but has yet to lead by example.

According to the New York Times, Reform Jews and Hindus are dramatically more likely to have household incomes over $75k than members of other religions. This gap is far greater than the income gap between any two racial groups. Conservative Jews and Anglicans are also very high.

Obviously there are reasons for this, some of which are pretty controversial. The Hindu gap is easy to nail down. Most Indians who have come to the United States are from the top performers of a nation of over one billion. The Federal government then gives them taxpayer backed business loans to buy motels, gas stations, etc. Regular US citizens do not have access to the special benefits and tax breaks given to immigrants. They pay no Federal taxes or social security for the first five years. Often the ownership of their businesses is transferred to a new relative before they have to start paying taxes.

When you have the best and the brightest of a nation of over one billion, and then give them dramatic special financial benefits not afforded to the native born, it is easy to see why Hindus are at the top. Buddhists are performing above the average for the same reason.

The data highlights just how bad native born Americans are being screwed by the massive giveaway to immigrants through taxpayer backed small business loans to immigrants.

Nailing down the reasons for the high incomes of Jews is more complicated. However, the fact that Ashkenazi (German) Jews have been a merchant class for at least 1,000 years is undoubtedly the leading factor. Ashkenazi Jews are also the top performers, on average, on IQ tests. Prior to WWII Ashkenazi Jews had achieved higher incomes than their non-Jewish countrymen in German, Hungary, and other places.

At the bottom of the list is Jehovah’s Witnesses, Pentecostals, and Baptists. All three of these denominations have a large percentage of black followers, as well as poorer rural whites.

The New York Times seems to suggest in their article that Jews and Hindus have become a privileged class with unfair advantages. Read Article from New York Times.

15-Leonhardt-popup-v3

The Holocaust is Now Catholic Dogma

pope-at-auschwitzThe last time a Pope of the Catholic Church defined an infallible dogma was in the year 1950. Pope Pius XII used this power reserved for the Vicar of Christ when speaking ex cathedra to define the Dogma of the Assumption of Mary. It was an extraordinary event because a pope using the power of infallibly to define a dogma is done so rarely, and most popes have never used this power. Before Pius XII, the last pope to invoke papal infallibly to define a dogma was Pius IX in 1854, when he defined the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception. Both of these dogmas referred to events that had occurred 19 centuries before , and that had been studied by the best minds of the Church for almost as long. That’s because when making an infallible statement – it goes without saying – it can’t contain any errors! Fast forward to 2009 and Pope Benedict XVI has just defined a new dogma regarding a secular event that has nothing to do with the Faith. Moreover, this ‘dogmatic event’ only occurred in the middle of the 20th Century-  and no one is allowed to investigate to see if it contains any errors!

A dogma is an infallible teaching of the Catholic Church that must be believed by every Catholic or they’re not in communion with the Church. In the past, a dogma referred only to a matter of Christian faith, and Catholics could believe whatever they wanted about historical events. But today’s remarks from the Vatican make it clear that the Jewish version of the Holocaust, in which 6 million Jews were killed in gas chambers, must be believed by every Catholic or they’re not in communion with the Church. That makes the Holocaust an official ‘dogma’ of the Catholic Faith (*sarcasm*).Here’s the news out of the Vatican.

On Jan. 28, the pope said he felt “full and indisputable solidarity” with Jews, and warned against any denial of the full horror of the Nazi genocide.

Bishop Williamson, in order to be admitted to episcopal functions within the church, will have to take his distance, in an absolutely unequivocal and public fashion, from his position on the Shoah, which the Holy Father was not aware of when the excommunication was lifted,” the statement said. The Shoah is the Hebrew term for the Holocaust.

Jewish groups welcomed the Vatican statement, saying it satisfied their key demand.

“This was the sign the Jewish world has been waiting for,” saidRonald Lauderpresident of the World Jewish Congress.

Yes, this is the sign the Jewish world has been waiting for, but what exactly does this “sign” really mean? It means that in the post-Vatican II Church, the “Shoah” has replaced the Crucifixion as the central event in history. And do you notice the subtle switcheroo here? Now, instead of the central tenet of the Christian faith pertaining to the murder of the Christ by Jews, the new central tenet refers to the murder of Jews by Christians! This should come as no surprise to those who understand what really lies at the heart of the problem. At its core, this is a spiritual battle that’s being waged above our heads. It’s Christ vs. anti-Christ, and each of us must choose a side.

Lucifer wanted to be equal to God and out of pride refused to accept being a servant. When he uttered his famous “non servium” he took a third of the angels with him and set about waging war against God. When God sent His Son to redeem the world, Lucifer tried to prevent it. He took Jesus to the mountain top and tempted Him, saying “if you just bow down and worship me, I will give you all these things.”  Jesus told the devil to buzz off. The Jews who rejected Jesus as the Messiah did so out of racial pride and ambition. They wanted an earthly kingdom where they would always be the ‘Chosen Ones’ and did not want to share a kingdom with the gentiles. But Jesus emphatically said that His kingdom was not of this world and to share the good news with the gentiles. The Jews who accepted the Messiah became the first Christians, and those who rejected Him fell into spiritual blindness. Satan takes advantage of Jewish hatred of Jesus and uses them to battle against the Church of Christ. The Jews continue to wait for a worldly Messiah, but the Messiah they await is known to us as the anti-Christ. Therefore, all Christians must love and pray for the Jewish people to accept Christ as the Messiah, thereby snatching them from the jaws of Satan, whom they don’t realize they are serving. 

This battle between Christ and anti-Christ is 2,000 years old and all popes throughout history have waged it (at least until 1958). That’s what makes the Church’s post-Vatican II attitude toward the Jews so perplexing, since it enables them to continue in spiritual blindness and sets the stage for the coming of the anti-Christ. Pope Leo XIIIhad a vision at the end of the 19th Century in which he forsaw that the devil had been given extra powers for 100 years to try to destroy the Church. This seems to coincide with the shift in power that took place in the 20th Century when after two world wars, the Jews took Palestine and solidified their control over the West. This was also the century in which the Jews unleashed their most deadly weapon, Communism, which caused the deaths of millions of people.  But these people’s genocides go unnoticed and certainly have not been declared “dogma” by a pope of the Catholic Church. Another clue that something is amiss inside the Church is that the Second Vatican Council refused to condemn Communism, but declared that anti-Semitism was a sin (without defining what constitutes anti-Semitism).

Enter Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), and the man who’s currently being crucified, Bishop Richard Williamson. Archbishop Lefebvre himself had fought inside the Second Vatican Council to prevent the coup of the liberals. He also stated that the mere fact that the Council refused to condemn Communism was enough to call the Council into question. The Archbishop knew that something nefarious had happened inside the Church and sensed that he was waging a battle against powers and principalities. In terms of his plans to restore Tradition, in theBiography of Marcel Lefebvre by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, he quotes the Archbishop as saying (pp. 500-501):

The Council is a non-infallible act of the Magisterium and, therefore, it is open to being influenced by a bad spirit … Therefore, we need to apply the criterion of Tradition to the various Council documents to see what we can keep, what needs clarifying, and what should be rejected.

And that’s exactly the whole point of the negotiations between the SSPX and the Vatican that have been going on for almost 40 years. After the release of the Latin Mass and the lifting of the excommunications, the next phase is doctrinal discussions. Butsomebody doesn’t want that to happen. Archbishop Lefebvre founded the SSPX in 1970 in order to train priests in Tradition and not in the confusing, untraditional, Judeo-Masonic manner of the post-Conciliar era. The greatest threat to Revolutionaries is those who are not afraid to resist them to the face, i.e., the Counter-Revolutionaries. That is why Pope John Paul II would not allow Archbishop Lefebvre to consecrecate bishops, something that is usually rubber-stamped for every other order. John Paul II wanted the SSPX to go extinct after the death of its founder and put a stop to the Counter-Revolution. And if the Council really was influenced by a “bad spirit” as the Archbishop said, then certainly any attempt to exorcise this bad spirit would be met with the fiercest resistance by those who work for the anti-Christ.

This is where the controversy over Bishop Williamson’s remarks about the actual number of Jews killed in the Holocaust comes into the scenario. If the Jews are (wittingly or unwittingly) working to bring about the reign of the anti-Christ, then part of their strategy has to be to neutralize the Church. In their effort to overturn the crucifixion and replace it with the “Shoah,” they’re trying to utilize the Church to bring this about. And any force that appears to provide resistance to this switcheroo will be seen as the gravest possible threat. Because truly, it wouldn’t have mattered if Bishop Williamson had not said a word about the Shoah, they would have found something else to try to impede the Church’s return to Tradition. Because Christ and anti-Christ cannot co-exist on equal terms – one must naturally dominate the other. And the Church returning to Tradition and her normal role as the Church Militant is the one monkey wrench that could be thrown into the plans of the anti-Christ. No other challenger intimidates them, absolutely no one else causes them to tremble. But a fully traditional Church Militant with a billion souls in her army is the one thing that could defeat their plans. And that’s what this is really all about.

Bishop Williamson now finds himself in the center of a controvery that has been coming to a head for a very long time. In perusing the Catholic blogosphere, it appears that most Catholics (even trads) wish that he had just kept his mouth shut. But they would probably have said the same thing to Jesus, so as not to annoy the Pharisees. But I’m convinced Our Lord Jesus Christ knows what he is doing. Because it is time to confront the truth, as the the hour glass of time winds down, and get ready for the final conflagration. But it appears most Christians would rather retreat to the hills, than risk not being popular with the world. Thankfully, for the sake of our salvation, Jesus Himself was not so pusillanimous. And hopefully Bishop Williamson won’t be so pusillanimous either, since his founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, most assuredly was not. The Archbishop personally chose Richard Williamson to carry on his work after his death, to be a successor to the apostles. The only question that remains is: will he be like St. John or like the others who abandoned Jesus “for fear of the Jews’?

The Church and the Jews have been locked in this battle for 2,000 years, so this latest controversy is nothing to be surprised about. Satan uses the poor, blinded Jews to attack the Lord’s Church because he doesn’t want us or them to be saved. But at least in the past, it used to be clear which side the popes were on! The Pope and SSPX bishops need all our prayers and support right now, because they are going through a trial by fire. And, at least in this early stage, it appears Bishop Fellay is starting to get cold feet. Every day for the past several days he has issued a denunciation of his colleague, Bishop Williamson, each one more hysterical than the last. He even went so far as to refer to the Jews as our “elder brothers in the faith,” as though the Talmud has anything to do with our Faith. When I said last week that I wished Bishop Fellay would one day be pope, I didn’t mean in the mold of John Paul II!

Let us pray especially for Pope Benedict XVI, the keeper of the keys to heaven, that he prove himself a worthy successor of St. Peter, and that he not imitate Peter in his denial of Jesus Christ. Archbishop Lefebvre recognized that the day would come when the SSPX would be called on to save the Church. And judging by the howls and screams from the satanic press, that day might be just around the corner. Let us hope that we also have the courage to stand beside them, no matter how much the media attack and lambaste us. It’s for the Jews’ own good after all, for they know not whom they are serving. As the Archbishop wrote in 1966 (ibid, pp. 382-83):

When the Holy Father realizes that those whom he trusted are leading the Church to her ruin, he will find himself a group of bishops … who are ready to rebuild. Unfortunately, the time has not yet come, because the Holy Father himself must change what he is doing, and that conversion will be painful.

Let us hope that the time has come and that Pope Benedict will accept the help of the SSPX. It is time for the Holy Father to stop taking sides with the enemies of the Church and to stop defining  secular events as “dogma,” especially ones so riddled through with holes. May God save the Church through His servant, Pope Benedict, although the Pope’s conversion will be painful.

(Source: gop-tea-pub)

3 notes

crime-and-killers:

Dr. Michael Stone’s Scale of Evil

Dr. Michael Stone has created a scale he calls Scale of evil. The scale stretches from 1 to 22 and Dr. Michael Stone places each and every serial killer on this scale all depending on how evil they are.

Level 1 
"Those who kill in self defense and do not show psychopathic tendencies."

Level 2. 
“Jealous lovers who, though egocentric or immature, are not psychopathic; crime passional”

Level 3
“Willing companions of killers: aberrant personality—probably impulse-ridden, with some antisocial traits”

Level 4
“Those who kill in self-defense, after extremely provocative behavior toward the victim”

Level 4
“Highly narcissistic, but not distinctly psychopathic persons, with a psychotic core, who kill loved ones or family members out of jealousy”

Level 5
"Traumatize, desperate people who kill abusive relatives and others.(like to support a drug habit)" but lack significant traits. Genuinely remorseful."

Level 6
"Impetuous hotheaded murderers without psychopatic features."

Level 7
"Highly narrsasistic , but not distinctly psychopathic people."
with a psychotic core, who kill those close to them. Jealously is an underlying motive.

Level 8
"Non psychopathic people with smoldering rage who kill when that rage is ignited."

Level 9
“Jealous lovers with marked psychopathic features”

Level 10
"Killers of people who where in the way or killed for example witnesses.(egocentric but not distinctly psychopathic)"

Level 11
"Psychopathic killers of people in the way."

Level 12
"Power-hungry psychopaths who kill when cornered."

Level 13
"Murderers with inadequate, rageful personalities and psychopathic features

Level 14
"Ruthlessly self-centered psychopathic schemers"

Level 15
"Psychopathic or cold blooded spree killers mulitple murders."

Level 16
"Psychopaths committing multiple vicious acts."

Level 17
"Sexually perverse serial murderers Torture-murderers. Murder is the primary motive, following prolonged torture(amoung the males rape is the primary motive with murder to hide the evidence. Systematic torture is not a primary factor".

Level 18
"Torture murderers with murder the primary motive."

Level 19
"Psychopaths driven to terrorism, subjugation, intimidation, and rape, but short of murder."

Level 20
"Torture murderers with torture as the primary motive but in psychopathic personalities."

Level 21
"Psyhcopaths preoccupied with torture in the extreme, but not known to have commited murder."

Level 22
"Psychopathic, serial torture-murderers, with torture the primary motive."

9,983 notes

nanodash:

stunningpicture:

The single most badass photo ever. Dr. Leonid Rogozov performing his own appendectomy

This is even more badass than it looks. This happened in 1961, while Dr. Rogozov was the only doctor on an Antarctic Expedition. When he got ill the nearest Russian station was more than 1000 km away and nearby foreign stations had no aircraft.
Even then it wouldn’t have mattered because he did this in a fucking blizzard, with a local anaesthetic  while he had a driver and a meteorologist hand him crap and hold a mirror. It took him two hours, with breaks because of “general weakness.”
He was back working 2 weeks after he did this. Legend.

nanodash:

stunningpicture:

The single most badass photo ever. Dr. Leonid Rogozov performing his own appendectomy

This is even more badass than it looks. This happened in 1961, while Dr. Rogozov was the only doctor on an Antarctic Expedition. When he got ill the nearest Russian station was more than 1000 km away and nearby foreign stations had no aircraft.

Even then it wouldn’t have mattered because he did this in a fucking blizzard, with a local anaesthetic  while he had a driver and a meteorologist hand him crap and hold a mirror. It took him two hours, with breaks because of “general weakness.”

He was back working 2 weeks after he did this. Legend.

2,781 notes

rtrixie:

tourkophagos:

craiganthonywells:

tourkophagos:

craiganthonywells:

But… learning to use a gun is learning how to kill effectively. If someone uses a car wrongly, they kill. If someone uses a gun correctly, they kill.

If someone uses a gun correctly, they kill in self defense.

They still kill.

So do cars, but you get a license which proves you’re able to operate one and I don’t see how the government should deny you that right if you can prove to be responsible by their own standards.

If someone uses a gun correctly, they hit their target, whatever that may be, and they know how to operate and maintain their weapon. If that target is an aggressor getting shot in self defense, then there is nothing wrong with that, and it is a good thing if people are able to access guns to defend themselves and their loved ones. 

rtrixie:

tourkophagos:

craiganthonywells:

tourkophagos:

craiganthonywells:

But… learning to use a gun is learning how to kill effectively. If someone uses a car wrongly, they kill. If someone uses a gun correctly, they kill.

If someone uses a gun correctly, they kill in self defense.

They still kill.

So do cars, but you get a license which proves you’re able to operate one and I don’t see how the government should deny you that right if you can prove to be responsible by their own standards.

If someone uses a gun correctly, they hit their target, whatever that may be, and they know how to operate and maintain their weapon. If that target is an aggressor getting shot in self defense, then there is nothing wrong with that, and it is a good thing if people are able to access guns to defend themselves and their loved ones. 

(Source: freeplanetickettonorthkorea)

710 notes

As the number of US drone strikes in Pakistan hits 400, research by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism finds that fewer than 4% of the people killed have been identified by available records as named members of al Qaeda. This calls in to question US Secretary of State John Kerry’s claim last year that only “confirmed terrorist targets at the highest level” were fired at.

(Source: hipsterlibertarian)

87 notes

daveandjadeotp:

jetgreguar:

i’ve been comprimised 

i laughed for about 349583492547252 years

daveandjadeotp:

jetgreguar:

i’ve been comprimised 

i laughed for about 349583492547252 years

(Source: 4gifs)

529,270 notes

Jew Disinfo Outlet Vox Said “Ebola No Problemo” a Month Ago, Now Admits It will Cover the Globe

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer

October 20, 2014

Back in September, Jewish propaganda outlets, suck as Vox, were claiming that there was virtually no chance that Ebola would leave Africa, even while Africans from infected countries were travelling freely and there was zero reason to think it wouldn’t spread.

Apparently, this was a means of buying time while they infected us.

Cool story, bro.

Cool story, bro. [bigger map]

Then, of course, Ebola defied Vox’s odds and came to America.  Then they admitted it is going to spread across the planet.
Yeah, but it's cool.

Yeah, but it’s cool.  Don’t worry, goyims. [bigger map]

And now, Vox – just like Huffington Post, Daily Beast, Salon, Barack Obama, MSNBC, etc. – is telling us that there is no way that banning flights would be able to stop the virus from entering America, because “they’ll find a way.”
Don't worry, silly goyims.

Don’t worry, silly goyims.

No one understands what this means.  Will the infected persons swim to America?  It’s a very long way to swim.  And those little maps you post, Vox, seem to indicate that air travel is the way this disease has been spread.  Pretty sure the guy who brought it to America was on a plane.

None of these endless articles and statements by Jews even really attempt to explain how the virus would travel, if air travel was banned.  They usually start out by saying that, then go into some sob story about the economy of Liberia.

This Vox article gives examples of limited travel bans and screenings, which in no way relates because that’s not what the hell we’re talking about here, Jews.  We’re talking about a complete and unconditional flight ban to and from West Africa.  None of the examples relate to what we are asking for in any way but “disease… air planes…”  It is completely ridiculous.  Like trying to trick a child with that hand thing where you make it look like you’re pulling off your own thumb.

How is it that we are now this stupid?

The Jewish explanation for why a West Africa flight ban could never work.

The Jewish explanation for why a West Africa flight ban could never work.

But no, fellow goyim, I’m pretty sure we can trust the Jews on this.  They might have been completely wrong about the other thing, but this, they are probably totally right about somehow, even though it makes no sense.  We can’t stop the disease from spreading by banning all flights, because in the 80s they tried to ban flights for people with AIDS, but the people with AIDS lied about having the disease to get on flights and spread it.  So if we ban all flights, it won’t help because people with Ebola will just lie about it and get on the flights anyway.

Don’t you get it, you stupid goyim?

There is no way to stop the spread.

But it doesn’t matter anyway, because it being in our country is irrelevant.

1 note